Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schooner Fare

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. RL0919 (talk) 23:34, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Schooner Fare

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable band ~T P W 14:36, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ~T P W 14:36, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:46, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There is significant independent coverage of Schooner Fare over the years that meets the #1 criterion of WP:BAND: "Folk and Traditional Elements in an Emerging Professional Art World: Regional Music in the American State of Maine" in International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music, Dec 1990 (vol 21, no 2)[1]; 1989 The Berkshire Eagle (MA)[2]; 1984 Longview News-Journal (TX)[3]; 1989 The Reporter (WI)[4]; 2004 Sun-Journal (ME)[5]; 2001 Sun-Journal (ME)[6]; 2006 Kennebec Journal (ME)[7]. (If article is kept, I will expand it with these sources.) Schazjmd (talk) 19:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Schazjmd's reasoning. --Jpcase (talk) 20:34, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the reliable sources coverage identified above by Schazjmd including journals and newspapers and there is also a staff written bio at AllMusic here. Together there is enough coverage to pass WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:07, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per the demonstration of reliable sources. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 15:20, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.